Facebook vs Instagram Contest Votes: Which Platform Wins in 2026?
Compare Facebook and Instagram contest votes in 2026 — pricing, delivery speed, audience demographics, detection risk, and which platform gives better ROI. Compare now.
Read more →Annual fan-vote program by WSOC-TV Channel 9 (Cox Media Group, Charlotte) selecting 22 elite Charlotte-region high school football players each fall, then crowning a Player of the Year through multi-round public online voting — up to 9 votes per day, free, with a $10,000 school prize.
The WSOC Big 22 is Charlotte's most prominent annual high school football honor. Each fall, WSOC-TV Channel 9 — the Cox Media Group ABC affiliate serving the Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord market — selects 22 of the top prep football players across the Charlotte region of North and South Carolina, based on on-field performance and character. The program entered its 16th year in 2025, making it one of the longest-running TV-station football recognition programs in the Southeast.
| Detail | What to know |
|---|---|
| Organizer | WSOC-TV Channel 9 / Cox Media Group |
| Presenting sponsor | Bojangles' Famous Chicken'n Biscuits |
| Geographic scope | Charlotte metro — NC and SC schools |
| Years running | Since 2009 (16th year in 2025) |
| Players honored | 22 per year on the roster |
| Vote cap | Up to 9 votes per day per voter |
| Cost to vote | Free, no account required |
| Round 1 volume | 140,000+ votes |
| POY prize | Trophy + $10,000 for winner's school |
| TV component | "Big 22 Players to Watch" broadcast special on WSOC |
Unlike weekly athlete-of-the-week polls, the Big 22 is a season-long program: selection to the 22-player roster is itself an honour, distinct from — and decided before — the Player of the Year fan vote.
Key fact
The Big 22 roster is not determined by fan vote — Channel 9's sports department selects the 22 honourees based on football performance and character. The public vote comes afterward, to select the Player of the Year from five finalists. This two-stage structure makes WSOC Big 22 one of the more credible prep football recognition programs in the region.
The Big 22 draws from a wide swath of the Charlotte metro, anchored by the powerhouse NCHSAA 4A and 3A programmes in Mecklenburg and Union counties plus competitive CISAA private schools. The table below maps the major feeder schools by area and classification.
| School | Classification | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Charlotte Catholic High School | NCHSAA 3A / CISAA | Southeast Charlotte |
| Myers Park High School | NCHSAA 4A | SouthPark, Charlotte |
| Mallard Creek High School | NCHSAA 4A | North Charlotte |
| Vance High School | NCHSAA 4A | North Charlotte |
| Julius L. Chambers (Vance-area) | NCHSAA 3A | Charlotte |
| Providence Day School | CISAA | Southeast Charlotte |
| Hough High School | NCHSAA 4A | Cornelius (Lake Norman) |
| Weddington High School | NCHSAA 3A | Weddington (Union County) |
| Monroe High School | NCHSAA 3A | Monroe (Union County) |
| Butler High School | NCHSAA 4A | Matthews |
| Northwest Cabarrus High School | NCHSAA 4A | Kannapolis |
| South Carolina schools (Rock Hill area) | SCHSL various | York County, SC |
Mallard Creek has produced a Player of the Year in the program — linebacker Trenton Simpson (2019), who went on to play at Clemson. Monroe's Jordan Young became the first back-to-back POY winner in the program's history, winning in both 2023 and 2024 before committing to Clemson as a safety. In 2025, Hough High School's Samari Matthews became the first Husky to claim the honour, marking Lake Norman's northern suburbs as a rising force in Charlotte-area football. South Carolina schools, particularly in Rock Hill's York County, appear on the roster regularly — Northwestern's Dupree Hart won the award in 2014, and Mount Pleasant's Landon Honeycutt was recognised in 2018.
The NC-SC split reflects the Big 22's genuine regional scope, but Mecklenburg and Union county schools in North Carolina account for the majority of roster spots and virtually all of the fan-vote engagement.
The Player of the Year award goes to the finalist who wins the final public fan vote, combining WSOC-TV sports staff input with the public tally. Below are the confirmed recent POY recipients — real names, real schools, real years.
| Year | Player | School | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Dupree Hart | Northwestern HS (Rock Hill, SC) | Early programme era winner |
| 2018 | Landon Honeycutt | Mount Pleasant HS (SC) | SC school Big 22 POY |
| 2019 | Trenton Simpson | Mallard Creek HS (Charlotte) | Went on to Clemson; multi-year ACC starter |
| 2023 | Jordan Young | Monroe HS (Monroe, NC) | First of back-to-back wins |
| 2024 | Jordan Young | Monroe HS (Monroe, NC) | First-ever back-to-back POY; Clemson commit |
| 2025 | Samari Matthews | Hough HS (Cornelius) | First Hough winner in programme history |
The POY list illustrates the programme's breadth: winners have come from SC York County, Mecklenburg County (Charlotte city schools), Union County (Monroe), and the growing Lake Norman corridor north of Charlotte. The absence of winners from Charlotte Catholic or Myers Park — consistently among the state's strongest football programmes — reflects the unpredictability of fan-vote outcomes when multiple large-booster schools enter the same final.
Key fact
Jordan Young's back-to-back Player of the Year wins in 2023 and 2024 are unique in the 16-year history of the programme. Young — a safety committed to Clemson — demonstrated how a combination of genuine football distinction and highly organised fan mobilisation across two consecutive seasons can produce an unprecedented result.
The WSOC Big 22 runs on a multi-round structure that is distinct from simple weekly newspaper polls. Understanding the stages is essential before planning any vote campaign.
Stage one: Channel 9's sports team selects the 22-player roster through an editorial process — public vote does not determine who makes the Big 22. Stage two: from the full roster, WSOC narrows to five finalists for Player of the Year; fans then vote in the open POY poll to determine the winner, with WSOC staff input weighted alongside the public tally.
| Stage | Typical timing | Who decides |
|---|---|---|
| Preseason nominations open | Late July – early August | Channel 9 sports staff + community input |
| Big 22 Media Day (player showcase) | Mid-August | Editorial selection — not a fan vote |
| Big 22 roster announced | August (before season) | Channel 9 editorial selection |
| "Big 22 Players to Watch" TV special airs | Late August / early September | Broadcast on WSOC-TV |
| Round 1 public vote opens | Early September (approx. Sept 5) | Fan vote — 140,000+ votes cast |
| Five finalists announced | Early October | Combined staff + fan input |
| POY fan vote opens | Mid-October (approx. Oct 10) | Fan vote — final public poll |
| Player of the Year announced | November (post-regular season) | Fan vote + WSOC staff weighting |
The vote cap is up to 9 votes per day per voter — significantly more generous than typical hourly-cap newspaper polls, meaning a well-organised campaign can accumulate large totals across a multi-week POY window.
Voting takes place at wsoctv.com and requires no account, email, or registration. Both mobile and desktop browsers are supported. Because the programme covers North and South Carolina, supporter networks on both sides of the state line can vote without restriction — a family in Rock Hill, SC casts the same vote as one in Ballantyne, NC.
Tip
The round 1 vote opens in early September and closes within a few weeks. Because 140,000+ votes are cast in round 1 alone, campaign timing matters: the athletes and schools that mobilise their networks in the first 48 hours consistently outpace late-starting campaigns. Set a reminder for the poll open date rather than waiting to hear about it through social channels.
The 9-votes-per-day cap — considerably higher than hourly-cap polls — means daily consistency over the full window matters far more than a single surge. Every realistic supporter network should be activated and reminded daily, not just once. For a broader overview of online voting strategy across contest types, see our full guide to online contest voting; the Charlotte-specific notes below focus on what works in this market.
The Big 22 fan base clusters around a few high-engagement community groups: NCHSAA 4A booster clubs in North Charlotte (Mallard Creek, Vance), southeast Charlotte private school networks (Charlotte Catholic, Providence Day), the growing Lake Norman corridor (Hough), and the Union County programmes (Weddington, Monroe). These communities differ in structure but share one trait — they are densely networked on Facebook, Instagram, and group chats.
| Tactic | Effort level | Charlotte-market fit |
|---|---|---|
| Direct poll link in team group chats on day 1 of voting | Very low | Very high — Charlotte football programmes have large parent and alumni chats |
| Daily booster club reminder email (for the full voting window) | Low | Very high — NCHSAA 4A schools with active boosters, especially North Charlotte |
| Instagram posts tagging the athlete and school athletic account | Low | High — Charlotte metro is active on Instagram, especially Lake Norman and SouthPark communities |
| Facebook community group posts (neighbourhood and school-specific pages) | Medium | High — Union County and Mecklenburg suburban groups convert well |
| Multiple devices per household using all 9 daily votes | Low (ongoing) | High — fully within programme rules |
| Cross-state mobilisation (SC family and alumni) | Medium | Medium — relevant for Rock Hill and Fort Mill-area nominees |
| Paid promotion to reach additional real voters | Low (outsourced) | Variable — see our sports poll votes service for paced delivery matched to the daily cap |
The 9-per-day cap means a single engaged supporter can accumulate over 300 votes across a five-week window — without violating any programme rule. A booster club email list of 500 families, each voting the daily maximum, can theoretically generate 150,000+ total votes over that window. That arithmetic explains why Jordan Young's back-to-back POY wins were possible: a Union County community with high engagement sustained across two full seasons.
When organic networks have been fully mobilised and the margin remains tight entering the final two weeks, some campaigns use a paid promotion service to reach additional verified real voters. If you pursue that approach, prioritise a provider that delivers paced, genuine votes that respect the daily cap structure — sudden spikes are detectable and counterproductive. Our sports fan poll service is designed around cap-matched pacing. For general information on how these services work across different poll types, see our how-to guides.
The WSOC Big 22 is a promotional fan-vote program run under Bojangles' sponsorship, governed by Channel 9's own contest rules rather than NC prize-promotion law (the $10,000 prize goes to the school, not an individual, which simplifies the legal framework). For the full balanced treatment of buying votes in online contests, see our buy-votes guide; the specific Big 22 notes are below.
Before you vote
WSOC's official Big 22 contest rules prohibit automated voting tools, bots, and scripts designed to circumvent the daily vote limit. The 2022 official rules — archived at wsoctv.com — explicitly state that fraudulent or mechanically generated votes are disqualified. Always read the current year's rules at wsoctv.com before using any external service. The consequence of detected automation is vote removal, not athlete disqualification or legal liability.
The practical line the rules draw is between automated scripts (prohibited) and human voters (permitted). A supporter casting 9 genuine votes per day from their own device, or a booster club email reaching 500 additional families — each of whom casts their own genuine daily votes — falls squarely within the intended fan-vote model. The contest is designed to reward organised communities, not just individual effort.
The $10,000 school prize raises the stakes relative to recognition-only polls — which is why organised campaigns in this contest tend to be more intensive than for typical weekly newspaper polls.
See the North Carolina contest hub for other regional poll programs active in the Carolinas, and the full US guide index for comparison across markets.
Go to wsoctv.com and navigate to the High School Football section. During the voting period, the active poll — either the round 1 roster vote or the Player of the Year finalist vote — is prominently featured on the sports homepage and in Channel 9's Big 22 coverage articles. Confirm the poll is still open by checking the close date shown on the voting widget before casting your first vote.
Click or tap the name of the Big 22 player you are supporting. Submit your vote using the poll widget — no account, email address, or registration is required. The programme allows up to 9 votes per day per voter. Cast all available votes in your first session, then note the date and return the following day to cast another full round.
Copy the direct URL of the active poll page and share it through every relevant channel: the athlete's social media, team group chats, booster club email lists, and neighbourhood Facebook groups. Include the player's name, school, and a clear call-to-action — "Vote up to 9 times today." The 9-per-day cap rewards daily reminders sent across the full voting window, not just a single push at open.
Check the live poll standings periodically during the voting window. The widget on wsoctv.com shows running totals. If the race is tight entering the last two days, increase the frequency of reminder messages to your networks and encourage every supporter to use their remaining daily votes before the poll closes. The Player of the Year result is announced by Channel 9 in November, shortly after the regular season ends.
15 answers covering legality, delivery, quality, pricing and platform specifics.
Last reviewed June 2026. Contest dates, rules and vote caps change each season — always confirm the current rules on the official contest page before you vote.
Practical guides, technical deep-dives, and anonymized case studies.60+ articles. Selection rotates.
Compare Facebook and Instagram contest votes in 2026 — pricing, delivery speed, audience demographics, detection risk, and which platform gives better ROI. Compare now.
Read more →
Avoid five costly mistakes when buying votes for sign-up required contests — timeline errors, account quality gaps, budget miscalculations, and refill terms to demand.
Read more →
Step-by-step playbook for winning Facebook photo contests in 2026 — vote-boosting strategy, safe promotion, and the critical 48-hour sprint.
Read more →
Instagram vs TikTok for contest votes in 2026 — vote mechanics, cost per vote, audience reach, detection risk, and which platform fits your competition type.
Read more →
The five costliest Instagram contest mistakes — broken Stories links, vote velocity spikes, weak entry presentation, and more — with exact fixes for each.
Read more →
IP-restricted contest voting explained — how per-IP vote limits work, what professional services do differently, subnet detection, IPv6 edge cases, and winning strategies.
Read more →
Hi 👋 — drop your contest URL and I'll send a price quote within an hour. No card needed yet.